initialize newly registered users with a v2 drive hash
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed881840cd
commit
8a18698c03
@ -72,7 +72,9 @@ define([
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
opt.channel64 = Util.hexToBase64(channelHex);
|
opt.channel64 = Util.hexToBase64(channelHex);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// XXX why don't we generate a v2 ?
|
// we still generate a v1 hash because this function needs to deterministically
|
||||||
|
// derive the same values as it always has. New accounts will generate their own
|
||||||
|
// userHash values
|
||||||
opt.userHash = '/1/edit/' + [opt.channel64, opt.keys.editKeyStr].join('/') + '/';
|
opt.userHash = '/1/edit/' + [opt.channel64, opt.keys.editKeyStr].join('/') + '/';
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return opt;
|
return opt;
|
||||||
@ -278,7 +280,8 @@ define([
|
|||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
console.log("allocating random bytes for a new user object");
|
console.log("allocating random bytes for a new user object");
|
||||||
opt = allocateBytes(Nacl.randomBytes(Exports.requiredBytes));
|
opt = allocateBytes(Nacl.randomBytes(Exports.requiredBytes));
|
||||||
userHash = opt.userHash;
|
// create a random v2 hash, since we don't need backwards compatibility
|
||||||
|
userHash = '/drive/#' + Hash.createRandomHash('drive');
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// according to the location derived from the credentials which you entered
|
// according to the location derived from the credentials which you entered
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user